
There’s a lot that Ted Turner taught me during the decade we were married and during the more than a decade that we’ve been unmarried but close friends. But one of my most favorite things I learned from him was to love prairie dogs. Please don’t stop reading now that you know I’m writing about prairie dogs and not some tasty gossip about my favorite ex-husband. Please don’t. Please stay with me, even if you’re a cattle rancher or a rancher’s wife or someone who loves to find things for target practice.
While we were married, we spent much time in the Great Plains–in New Mexico, South Dakota and the Sand Hills of Nebraska. Especially in New Mexico, I would spend hours watching the way prairie dogs behave, how they pop up out of their underground dens and stand on the mounds in what looks like the start of a Sun Salutation. Sometimes, their little paws press together as if in prayer.



I loved watching the young ones play and how they flattened themselves out in the dust when they were hot. At least that’s how I interpreted it. Maybe they were just tired.


I discovered that prairie love to kiss. It starts when they’re very young and continues, maybe as a way of getting to know dogs from another den or maybe just a way of acknowledging love.




From Ted, I learned that these fascinating little creatures are what’s known as a ‘keystone species,’ a linchpin of prairie ecology. Eradicate them and you create a domino effect, imperiling a host of other species that depend on them. At the time Louis and Clark made their famous expedition through the West it is estimated that there were five billion prairie dogs living across one hundred million acres. Today there are fewer than 5% of their original number.
From Ted I learned that the black-footed ferret was extinct in the wild because their only food was the prairie dog and as the prairie dog numbers declined dramatically, these ferrets disappeared. A few were being kept in zoos and Ted wanted to restore them to their natural Great Plains habitat as he is doing this with many native species on his 2 million acres–from bison, wolves and Desert Big Horn Sheep to snakes, bees, woodpeckers and plants. To understand the scope of Ted’s conservation undertakings–what’s known as “re-wilding,” I urge you to read “Last Stand: Ted Turner’s Quest to Save a Troubled Plane,” by Todd Wilkinson. It is powerful and, for me anyway, very moving to learn how this brilliant, maverick media mogul is creating a template for other landowners (and they don’t have to be of the super wealthy variety although when these latter follow Ted’s lead, it’s possible that a tipping point of conservation may be achieved. What Ted shows is that environmentalism and prosperity can coexist. )
Recently, a house guest at my New Mexico ranch gave me a book by Terry Tempest Williams called “Finding Beauty In A Broken World.” It is a beautiful, profound book and, wonder of wonders, she devotes many chapters to prairie dogs. Williams says “More than 200 species of wildlife have been associated with prairie dog towns, with over 140 species benefitting directly. . . .Nine vertebrate species may drop in population or disappear completely if prairie dogs are eliminated from the grassland ecosystem.”
Yet many people in the West consider prairie dogs heinous vermin, varmints that they are committed to eradicating by poisoning their dens with cyanide, strychnine, or fumigation. There are actual organizations devoted to this such as the Red Mist Society (when shot, the prairie dog’s bodies explode in a bloody, red mist), The Varmint Hunters Assoc., among many others. There are guys who think it’s fun to round up some buddies, a chest of cold beer, and spend a weekend afternoon competing for who can kill the most prairie dogs.
The reason behind this desire to exterminate these native ground squirrels is that for many generations, they’ve been considered competitors with grazing cattle. There is, I believe, some truth to this. If ranchers don’t rotate their cattle so they aren’t constantly eating the same pastures, they and the prairie dogs will eat the grasses down to nothing. If, however, cattle are managed the way Ted manages his herds of bison and other ranchers manage their cattle, then the co-existence of prairie dogs and livestock can be of mutual benefit. If this were not the case, the two species could never have evolved together for millions of years, working jointly to make the vast western plains as bountiful as they were.
Both bison, themselves a keystone species, and prairie dogs originated during the Pleistocene era and evolved together over 2 million years. Bison keep the grass cropped low, thereby allowing the prairie dogs to see predators approaching as they stand in prayer pose on their mounds. And the way prairie dogs prune the prairie grasslands creates very nutritious grass for bison or cattle. If one pays attention, you can see that, especially at spring green-up time, livestock even prefer these pruned grasses. Also, the prairie dog’s underground dens trap water, and help aerate the soil.
In the ’90s while I was with him, Ted created the Turner Endangered Species Fund and on several of his ranches he has allowed enormous prairie dog colonies to develop. On his Vermejo Park Ranch in northern New Mexico, in addition to a vast prairie dog colony, he has established a black-footed ferret captive breeding facility. As adults, some of the ferrets are moved to other locations where there are sufficient prairie dogs to sustain them and a carefully monitored number of them are allowed to run wild on the Vermejo. Very few people can claim to have been responsible for the restoration of a species and NEVER has it been someone whose life was spent, not as a biologist, but winning sailing championships and changing the landscape of the media.
When the sun is just right, it is an awesome experience known to all too few of us, to sit very quietly just at the edge of Vermejo Park’s prairie dog town where there are now 120,000 of the animals on 8,000 acres and see them standing on their mounds, saluting the sun, as far as the eye can see. I know. I’ve done it.
I want to quote from Terry Tempest William’s “Finding Beauty In A Broken World.” This is an excerpt from a letter the author received from biologist Constantine Slobodchikoff who spent 20 years researching communication patterns among prairie dogs and proved that they have the most sophisticated animal language decoded so far:
“One of my PhD students did a comparative study of the alarm calls of all five species of prairie dogs, calling for her when she was wearing either a yellow shirt or a green one. All five species had distinctly different calls for the two colors of shirts. Also, each species had different vocalizations for each color, suggesting that each species has its own language, but the languages differ from one another, much as German, French, and English differ.
“We just finished a study of black-tailed prairie dogs, showing that they had the same kind of descriptive elements in their alarm calls as the Gunnison’s, describing the color of the clothes and the size and shape of different humans. We also slowed that they could remember when someone shot a gun, and could incorporate this information into their alarm calls, calling in a way that was distinctly different from the alarm calls they gave to the same person prior to his shooting the gun. So my guess is that each species has a very sophisticated language, and has the cognitive capacity to detect subtle differences among predators and incorporate information about these differences into the alarm calls.
“I am hoping that this work will help show that prairie dogs, and all animals, are not just mindless robots that can be disposed of as vermin or property but as sentient beings that should be treated with empathy and respect.” I hope so too. That’s why I’ve quoted this here.
When I first started spending part of my life near Santa Fe, there was a nice size prairie dog colony along the railroad tracks parallel to Cerrillos Rd. near St. Francis. Now, development has eliminated the colony. The last time I was there, I noticed one lone prairie dog mound on the other side of the road sandwiched into a tiny triangle of dirt in between a some chain link fence. I cannot rid myself of sadness ever since. I can’t stop thinking about that little family. I pray that they survive.
I think all the time of how interdependent life is . . . all of life. We homo sapiens are no different, yet we are doing what even the sorriest of dogs don’t do unless they’re sick: we’re soiling and destroying our own kennel–Earth.
I want to close this blog with another quote dealing with interdependence. It’s from “The Faraway Nearby” by Rebecca Solnit:
“Some species of yucca plan and of moth depend upon each other. The white moths hatch out of their cocoons as the white flowers open. They mate and the female pollinates the flowers while laying her eggs in them, so that they will produce the fruit on which her offspring will feed. The yucca survives only by the pollination efforts of this moth, the larvae survive only by consuming this particular fruit. They would not exist without each other, and the yuccas of these species grown elsewhere have to be hand-pollinated.”
We cannot, as a species, risk losing more species. Let’s think about this ad do all we can, individually and collectively.

Rachel Albang
Congrats Jane on your recent award, well deserved! I appreciate your philanthropic heart and love of all animals. I know, like you, too well the pain of holding a beloved pet while it’s being put to sleep. I am new to the realm of activism but have started a petition against the cruel treatment of farm animals – horses, pigs, sheep, cows and chickens – in long distance transport where they go without food and water and rest for literally days. It’s heartbreaking and millions die each year on the road. If you have a moment to sign my petition at change.org via chn.ge/U8flPU, the animals and I would so appreciate it! All the best to you! Rachel
Cherie
I’m a bit late to the rodeo on this post, my apologies. This morning on Facebook I read an account of over 100 prairie dogs in CO being relocated after their home territory was destroyed due to construction of a shopping center. I was appalled at the responses from so many people saying these animals should have been destroyed or used for target practice and how if they have Prairie Dogs on their land they kill them. I was disappointed and greatly saddened. Below that post was a link to this story and it renewed my faith in humanity. 🙂 Thank you for sharing…
Wendy
I just found this post, but I have to comment…. OOO. EEMMM GEEE!! The little hands!! Like raccoons! AND the KISSES. PRECIOUS! I have no idea how people could want to hurt them; I nearly had a breakdown when I thought I ran over a squirrel last week. (He was fine!)
pholmes
will you sign my petition to save prairie dogs? thanks http://www.thepetitionsite.com/758/476/351/mommy-i-heard-that-naparo-university-is-going-to-have-all-of-us-killed/
pholmes
Ms Fonda,
Great article and don’t you just love the prairie dogs?
I need your help to save about 100 prairie dogs in Boulder, Colorado.
Naropa, a Buddhist inspired university is contemplating kill these amazing critters. I started a petition and when we got over 130,000 signatures from world over, the petition was delivered.
Naropa claimed that they want to use the permit to spur community to help them and they wanted to use it to get attention. They got the attention and also offer to help from WildLands Defense provided they withdraw the kill application which I do not think is unreasonable. Still they refused to withdraw their kill permit application whilst saying they do not want to kill these prairie dogs. Many of us posted on Naropa’s facebook urging them not to kill these prairie dogs but anyone who dares to speak up for these innocent critters have had our comments deleted and many of us have been banned. They left one prairie dog post as it did not gather the many comments compared to the one they deleted. They put out false information and we have no way of correct their misinformation and play the victim when the real victims are these innocent prairie dogs.
I and a few emailed His Holiness but have yet to receive a response. Will you be willing to lend your voice for these sentient critters? Many have been so persecuted in Colorado. Only today I heard that a colony in Aurora will be poisoned. Will you help us save the Naropa prairie dogs? Your celebrity status will certain bring a lot media attention to this petition. here is my petition http://www.thepetitionsite.com/758/476/351/mommy-i-heard-that-naparo-university-is-going-to-have-all-of-us-killed/ thanks so much for your kind attention.
mary hilton
Hi, well this seems a little late, by 2 years perhaps, but, it’s because I just read an article of your recent home/acreage sale of Forked Lightning Ranch. Congrats!-always a great feeling. Anyway, I love this article, grew up in a desert with lots of prairie dogs-before expansion-out in no man’s land. And, they were always amazing to watch. Very nice to help them. I was dismayed though when the first interior photo of your ranch showed a 6-point elk head mounted above your fireplace in the living room and stated that you had killed it at Ted Turner’s ranch in Montana, while hunting. Doesn’t that seem a little hypocritical of both you and Ted Turner; to urge compassion and empathy toward one species of animal in one breath, but then pridefully display a hunted elk’s head that you shot and killed in your gorgeous living room? How do the two acts reconcile-I don’t get it.
Michael Makuye
Just a note for those who may be curious about prairie dog language – for a functional language it seems to be:
Explore the work of Con Slobodchikoff at AZ State on his and others’ work on this. Dr. Slobodchikoff has been involved in critique and proposal of just what we mean when using the term, language. His Discourse System seems a better description tan do any of those of contenders seeking to artificially and inaccurately limit verbal language to a single primate.
From cetaceans to bats, there are contingent complexities showing that very specific meaningful communications occur, evolved and meant to transfer important information.
As a student of wolves, wildlife, genetics, conservation science and neurology, I’ve found though, that consciousness, awareness, intentionality, and purposeful communication and sociality do not depend upon symbolic verbal language.
Some of our own difficulties have arisen due to the capacity for deception and imagined gauging of reciprocity imposed by our particular kind and use of language. But that, while exceedingly important to our sociality, is a subject requiring more of your exploration outside Ms. Fonda’s blog.
To Ms. Fonda on the interactions of state wildlife agencies and Mr. Turner’s efforts:
It seems that the US Constitution, formed before the valuation of wild, self-willed animal species as essential to the integrity and persistence of vital resources such as water, soil, and even air (but that issue would need a deep grasp of palaeontology to cover), overgeneralized, now interpreted as states having all rights not specifically given to the federal government.
This even though commerce in the usage of the late 1700s, meant practically any interaction,from speech, affinity, or even sex. Wildlife, animals, are highly mobile, not limiting themselves to artificial boundary lines drawn on human maps. This alone should infer that they participate in interstate and international commerce, if commerce were not later limited to mean “trash for cash.”
So the allocation of other animals than ourselves as property, and in the case of wild, self-willed animals, as state property rests upon some facile and erroneous judicial precedent.
That’swhy the destructive intrusion of state into privately-held conservation intent. Florida has an effective apex predator, the Florida Panther a subspecies of Puma concolor; it’s a critically-endangered animal.
Predator populations, as some know, rise and fall following herbivore numbers. Those interested should explore the iterations of the “Green World Hypothesis”; if not for ecologically effective predator populations, in short, the world would not be so green as you see.
I believe that Mr. Turner understands these issues, as does Ms. Fonda (I had wondered what she was doing these days; her lifetime concerns have had a good influence on many, many people, and hopefully will help to change some drawbacks of the present culture).
We too often find that those with good intent dissipate their social effectiveness through needlessly attacking others whose goals and values are conducive to bettering the plight of the real world around us. Sometimes we even align with ideations inimical to conservation and health. Ms. Fonda and Mr. Turner both in their individual way, live on the message of life.
All human groups seem to have had cultural practices in which some trophies are retained, in order to self-identify and remind of relationships. While trophy hunting since Victorian Europe has gone beyond all reasonable bounds (famed Teddy Roosevelt , for instance, while acting to effect much conservation, misperceived the gray wolf , fatuously in his mind separating the species from its indispensable participation in preserving all he loved), the present excesses of for instance, Trump’s children, shoot prairie dogs and elephants, run counter to any understandable recognition of the value of life. I’ve been right up close to numerous wild animals experiencing death, and can tell you that denying a meaning beyond that granted to any outside our personal or imagined loved ones, is a cultural mistake so grave that it has one accurate word – aberrance.
I admit that I do write from outside the Eurasian and any culture that fails to grant equivalent status to lives other than ours or our domestics. Against gratuitous murder, I once found that my opinion was of no consequence to that of the elected and self-aggrandizing social “leaders.”
Strangely, Ms Fonda’s work with antiwar former social domestics, taught us children that society only responds to those associated with perceived social status. A lesson indeed; only those you include in your perceived community, gain pity; and pity is one of the meanings of the Polynesian word aloha – its full meanings include friendship, passion, love, unconditional regard. It should carry us to realization that we should not slice concepts so thin as to make each absent meaning.